Essay on Tsar After 1905 - 1195 Words

Tsar After 1905 It would be true to say that the Tsar remained unscathed after 1905, as he remained on the throne until 1917. However, it would also be true to say that the Tsar was permanently damaged by the 1905 revolution. Before 1905, there was much unrest and discontent. Famines in 1897, 1898 and 1901, made the already struggling countryside even worse, and the usually loyal peasantry held uprisings in two provinces in 1902. The Russo-Japanese war caused further unrest following a series of defeats, including that of Port Arthur. This caused revolutionary outbreaks to spread rapidly throughout Russia and gave way for various Liberal groups to press for their demands for a†¦show more content†¦Nicolas II was forced to make concessions. He would never fully recover from this event as Revolutionaries saw this as an example where violence achieved aims. On 3rd March1905, the Tsar offered a consultative assembly to try and bring an end to the violence. The rest of 1905 continued in a similar way. Defeats in Japan caused further outrage in Russia, which caused the Tsar to make further concessions. For example; the Battle of Tsushima on the 27th May, (where the Russian Baltic fleet were destroyed), lead to a disorder of widespread strikes in June and August, which lead to the Tsar promising an Imperial Duma on the 19th August. The formation of the Union of Unions on the 8th March was significant, as the middle classes and peasants formed new opposition to the Tsar. This affected the Tsar long-term as never before had these groups opposed him. Nicholas II was forced to introduce new measures to regain the support of these people. Further defeats at Mukden and Tsushima meant that the Tsar was in danger of loosing more support. His repeated pledges of March were ridiculed as no plans were put into action and further protests continued. During the summer, the Tsars position worsened as his own troops turned against him. Several ships went on strike due to poor conditions and in June,Show MoreRelatedHow Far Was the Russo – Japanese War of 1904 – 1905 Responsible for the Outbreak of the 1905 Revolution?1021 Words   |  5 PagesThe Russo – Japanese war did is seen as a short term factor that was responsible for the 1905 revolution, however there are many other short term and long term factors which also contribute to being responsible for the 1905 revolution. The way the Tsar ran the country, social problems, changing society inside and outside Russia, Bloody Sunday etc... The Russo – Japanese war saw Russia lose to Japan. Russia saw itself as a great and powerful country, compared to others, Russia wanted to expandRead MoreWhy Did the 1905 Revolution Fail746 Words   |  3 PagesWhy did the 1905 revolution fail? One of the main reasons that the 1905 revolution failed was because the October Manifesto merely only satisfied the middle classes’ appetite for reform. However this was only a short term change in government therefore it was not really a revolution because the changes were not permanent. To add, the readiness of the liberals to accept the government’s political and economical bribes indicted that they were not genuinely ready for a revolution at this time. FurthermoreRead MoreEssay about Tsars Survival of the 1905 Revolution1223 Words   |  5 PagesTsars Survival of the 1905 Revolution In 1905 tsarism suffered a dreadful battering, Tsar Nicolas III had to cope with opposition from all sides. The workers and the army were unhappy with their working conditions; they wanted minimum wage and more rights. The peasants wanted more land and the liberals wanted a better political system that was more democratic and gave them more say in how the country was run. He had to contend with numerous strikes, uprisings, assassinationsRead Morefrench essay1309 Words   |  6 Pagesï » ¿How far was the russo-Japanese war responsible for the outbreak in Russia 1905? The Russo-Japanese war took place in 1904 to 1905 and began because of both Russia and Japans desire to expand their borders into places such as Korea. During this war, Russia was humiliated and had many defeats from a country which were considered to be inferior. The defeat of this war humiliated the people of Russia and therefore lost confidence in Nicholas II. Russia’s defeat in the war also caused problems inRead MoreWhy Was There a Revolution in Russia in 1905936 Words   |  4 PagesWhy was there a revolution in Russia in 1905? The 1905 revolution happened for many reasons and so a combination of factors will best explain this question. However the most important reason was the tsar and his ignorant beliefs and attitudes towards Russia. The Russo-Japanese war was a major factor in starting the revolution in 1905, the whole purpose of the war was to try and stop the thoughts of rebellion by getting the Russian people to rally for their country, however when Russia lost theRead MoreThe Nature of Pre-revolutionary Society and Government807 Words   |  4 PagesRussia. In social terms, the Russian Tsar did not allow political opinions and therefore did not allow the congregation of political enthusiasts, limiting the opportunity for a revolution. In economic terms, Russian peasants were stuck in a situation where they had to pay large taxes to landowners, leaving little money for themselves and their families. In political terms, the Tsar held a strong kingdom, which condemned the peasants to an inferior lifestyle, as the Tsar government believed the ‘dark masses’Read MoreThe Occurrence of the 1905 Revolution and the Ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II925 Words   |  4 PagesThe Occurrence of the 1905 Revolut ion and the Ineptitude of Tsar Nicholas II The 1905 Revolution in Russia occurred because of a variety of long and short term causes, which led to the Tsar to lose the support of his people. These causes comprised of the economic hardship in Russia, the refusal of the government to broaden their representation, the military failure, and the mishandling of the 1905 crisis, Bloody Sunday. However, the underlying factor in all of these causesRead More1917 Russian Revolution Essay1114 Words   |  5 Pagesbeen defeated in all except the war with Turkey and its government and economy had the scars to prove it. A severe lack of food and poor living conditions amongst the peasant population led firstly to strikes and quickly escalated to violent riots. Tsar Nicholas II ruled Russia with an iron hand while much of Europe was moving away from the monarchical system of rule. All lands were owned by the Tsar’s family and Nobel land lords while the factories and industrial complexes were owned by the capitalists’Read MoreMain Problems Facing Russia in 1894 How Had They Been Dealt with by 19141677 Words   |  7 PagesThe last Tsar Nicholas II ascended the throne in 1894 and was faced with a country that was trying to free itself from its autocratic regime. The serfs had recently been emancipated, the industry and economy was just starting to develop and opposition to the Tsar was building up. Russia was still behind Europe in terms of the political regime, the social conditions and the economy. Nicholas II who was a weak and very influenced by his mother and his wife had to deal with Russia’s troubles duringRead More Nikolai Aleksandrovich Romanov: The Last Tsar of Russia1611 Words   |  7 Pages:Nikolai Aleksandrovich Romanov, the last standing Tsar of Russia officially known as Tsar Nicholas II, autocrat of Russia. Nicholas II was born on 18th May, 1868 in Tsarskoe Selo, Russia. Nicholas II was the eldest son of Alexander III and his Empress Marie Romanova. Nicholas was eldest of six children. He had three younger brothers, Alexander, George, Michael and two younger sisters, Xenia and Olga. Nicholas II ruled from 1894 until his abdication on 15 March 1917, his reign saw imperial Russia